Main image of article How to Spot Red Flags in Contract Listings

Tech freelancers just starting out are often eager to secure contracts and get on with the job and may not be fully versed in details that would raise concerns with their more experienced colleagues.

An attractive contract listing can quickly turn into a costly misstep if key details are vague, unrealistic, or simply missing. From ill-defined project scopes to unclear payment terms, spotting the warning signs early can save time, money, and professional frustration.

Vague scopes, missing timelines, or payment structures that leave you chasing invoices for months are some of the most common traps.

For contractors—especially those just starting out—resisting the temptation to sign without scrutiny is crucial. The key is turning the contract into a conversation before committing.

“Contracts should evoke a conversation,” said Jason Schoch, global head of student experience and career service at General Assembly. “A lot of times, a freelancer will get a contract and feel like they need to sign it, or they’ll lose the job. You want to receive the contract, read it over, and then reach back out to the client and ask questions.”

One early red flag is when the listing appears to combine multiple roles into one.

“If I’m a software developer, does it feel like they’re asking a lot of questions about design and aesthetics and UI?” Schoch said. “Or if I’m a UX designer, are they expecting me to build an actual prototype? That could be outside my scope.”

Another common pitfall: timelines and deliverables that are open-ended or undefined. Without clear parameters—such as a set number of revisions or a firm completion point—a contract can spiral into endless work.

“There should be a clear definition of done,” Schoch said. “This contract is fulfilled when I turn in this and I’m giving the client two or three revisions. Once those are used, the contract is complete.”

Randy Gross, CISO of CompTIA, said that lack of definition is a “burning red” flag.

“If they don’t have a very clear idea of what they want, that’s toxic,” Gross said. “You can get brought into something that’s melting down, have no support, and not know what the deliverables are.”

He cautions that could result in you being out of work very quickly because you didn’t solved some nebulous issue you didn’t even know existed.

Gross added that asking clarifying questions upfront isn’t just self-protection—it can actually lead to more work.

“The best outcomes I’ve had are when we are very clear about what we want done,” Gross said. “What happens from that is you end up demonstrating your capacity, and invariably, things grow organically.”

If scope and timelines are the first two pillars of a safe contract, payment terms are the third.

“What is the amount you agreed upon, and what is the remittance schedule for that amount?” Schoch said. “If it’s net 30, they don’t have to pay you for 30 days after you submit your project. That could mean it takes you 30 days to build it, then another 30 to get paid. That’s a long period of time.”

Negotiating for half up front and half upon delivery—or shortening the payment window—can help maintain cash flow.

“This is another conversation point I try to empower our folks to have,” Schoch said.

Gross notes that pay rate transparency can also be a challenge for new contractors.

“I’ve had the most familiarity with Upwork for that transparency in terms of what’s paid,” he said. “You’ll see what their rate cards are based on your experience and the technologies you’re in.”

Even experienced contractors benefit from a second opinion on questionable listings or contract clauses. Schoch advises leveraging both human and technology resources.

“All of the coaches are comfortable having those conversations with job seekers,” he said. “More and more folks are also using AI to ask specific questions about contracts. AI isn’t flawless, but it’s a good first litmus test if you prompt it correctly.”

Third-party platforms like Upwork can also help freelancers navigate contracts, especially for gig and project-based roles.

Gross recommends online communities and meetups as another source of advice.

“Reddit has information, in terms of asking about contracting and particular technologies,” he said. “Community groups in mid-size to larger cities are pretty extensive, and you can usually find one you can fit into. There are a lot of Discord groups.”

LinkedIn, he noted, can also surface valuable insight if you’re willing to wade through less relevant content.

“There’s some absolute gold on there,” he said. “You just have to fight through it.”

While resources can help, much of spotting a red flag comes down to trusting your instincts and refusing to rush into an agreement. Schoch recalled advising a graduate who was uneasy about language in an offer letter.

“He didn’t know if he needed to sign it or he’d lose the offer,” Schoch said. “I told him to reach out to the company. They might not even know what’s in it—and sure enough, they didn’t. They took it out.”

Gross echoed the need for caution, especially when urgency is used as a tactic to push acceptance. From his perspective, careful review, clear communication, and the willingness to walk away are the best defenses against problematic contract work.

“Signing up for things without asking questions is toxic,” he said. “Being inside a job that’s miserable is worse than asking questions first.”