To gather more information about the candidate earlier in the hiring process, recruiters can provide an on-demand interview where applicants can record answers and complete a coding assessment within the platform. This method improves the candidates’ experience as they can complete assessments on their own time, interact with a single recruiting system as opposed to using various tools, and demonstrate why they’d add value to the role and organization by showcasing their skills. For recruiters, filmed responses and assessments allow for better hiring decisions when working directly with IT hiring managers. These IT skills assessments help bolster the relationship between recruiters and hiring managers by ensuring that the candidates they bring in have the right skill set for the job.In theory, recorded responses and assessments would allow recruiters and hiring managers to decide on job candidates in an easier, more streamlined way; it might also reduce some of the unconscious bias that creeps into the interview process, by boosting qualified candidates before they ever set foot in an interview room. Of course, testing isn't a new concept when it comes to hiring; some firms have taken to providing homework to potential candidates as a means of evaluation. While many see this method as valuable, it has led to the inevitable criticism that some firms treat these assignments less like an evaluation and more like free temp labor. Indeed recently launched Assessments, a testing platform that helps companies determine if candidates are ready for open positions before they arrive for an interview. It offers pre-fabricated tests created by “experts,” or companies can create their own tests. Answers can be timed, and tests can simulate real-life scenarios that candidates may encounter on the job. Hiring managers can view a candidate's test scores and integrate them with candidate-tracking software such as Workable or Jobvite. Indeed’s stated goals are to “eliminate bias” and “provide consistency in candidate evaluation,” which is the overall goal of testing versus a tedious interview process. Whatever you think of the idea of candidates walking pre-tested into job interviews, instituting such a process will take quite a bit of effort on companies' parts. But that effort might be worth it for recruiters and hiring managers who have too many slots to fill and not nearly enough time.
Job interviews are some of the most nerve-wracking experiences you’ll have in life. The traditional model of interviewing hinged largely on whether or not the interviewers liked you, and unconscious bias played a huge role in landing people jobs. That's not fair. Some people who observe the job market think that pre-interview testing might be our best path toward reforming job interviews. Such testing allows companies to gather more information on candidates earlier in the hiring process, and gives those candidates a chance to prove they have what it takes to do the job. Andy Bonk, founder and product manager at Montage, a hiring tech firm, has an idea of how such a process might work: