Age Discrimination Examples: Recognizing and Preventing Ageism in Hiring

The present-day workforce experiences extensive discrimination based on their age during the hiring process. Ageism continues to be a challenge even though the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 provides legal protection. Many older employees report experiencing age discrimination as job postings favor younger candidates. If you’re wondering how you can recognize and address age discrimination, this guide helps you understand its effects on hiring, common instances at work, its impact on employees and strategies to prevent age discrimination. It also explains how your organization can develop hiring procedures to include employees across all age groups.

Understanding Age Discrimination in Hiring

Hiring discrimination against applicants based on their age shows unfair treatment toward them. The protection of workers over age 40 receives the most focus under existing legal provisions, but the problem also impacts those under 40. Employers commonly perceive older job seekers as not technologically well-versed and younger candidates as lacking experience. This discrimination can manifest in different forms, such as biased hiring decisions and unfair compensation.

A report by AARP shows that about six in 10 employees over the age of 50 have seen or experienced subtle signs of age discrimination at work.

The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 prohibits employers from age-based hiring decisions. It comes with important provisions:

• Protected age group: The law safeguards workers 40 years old and above from age discrimination in private, public and labor organizations.
• Employer coverage: All employers maintaining at least 20 employees must comply with this law.
• Prohibited practices: Employers must avoid discriminatory practices involving hiring, firing and promoting staff while delivering compensation and award packages. 
• Retaliation protection: The law protects employees who file workplace age discrimination cases by prohibiting retaliation or punishment against them or colleagues who assist.

Common Examples of Age Discrimination in Hiring

Age discrimination targets all candidates, regardless of their age group, in overt or subtle ways. Here are some common instances:

1. Biased job postings: Job postings can use terms such as “digital native” or “youthful team” that can deter older applicants from applying and make them feel excluded. 
2. Age-related assumptions in job requirements: Older job seekers can feel discouraged from applying when they have the maximum acceptable years of experience. This practice assumes that older workers are too experienced or less adaptable, which is frequently untrue. 
3. Interview practices: The interview process shows a different approach toward older individuals than the younger workforce, based on beliefs about technological limitations. 
4. Stereotypical language: Language that perpetuates age stereotypes through phrases such as “fresh face” or “set in their ways” leads to discrimination based on age. 
5. Euphemisms in hiring decisions: Euphemisms in hiring decisions hide behind terms such as “fresh perspectives” and “new energy” to support the selection of younger candidates. 
6. Assumptions about technological skills: Older employees face discrimination in their technological capabilities through stereotypes that prevent them from specific positions.
7. Exclusionary workplace activities: Creating social activities that exclude specific age groups can affect candidates’ perception of company culture.

The Impact of Age Discrimination on Candidates and Organizations

Below is an exploration of how age discrimination affects individuals and organizations.

Consequences for job seekers may involve:

• Prolonged employment: The hiring process rejects one out of every 16 adults over age 50 due to their age, and 74% of them think age becomes the main barrier during their job search. 
• Forced early retirement: It can affect many older employees with assumptions about their inability to adapt and master technology.  
• Psychological and health impacts: Age discrimination can create mental health challenges that manifest as depression and feelings of worthlessness in older employees.
• Impact on younger workforce: The prejudice toward older employees can create preconceived notions in the younger workforce. It can also lead to self-doubt and the inability to advance in their careers professionally despite their potential. 

Consequences for organizations may include:

• Loss of talent: Organizations that practice age discrimination miss out on fresh viewpoints and perspectives from different generations of employees. 
• Legal and financial risks: Organizations become exposed to legal vulnerability and financial consequences when they practice age discrimination under the ADEA and can face similar potential legal actions. 
• Damage to employer brand: Discrimination against employees based on their age can hurt your organziation’s reputation, impacting future hiring success.

Strategies to Prevent Age Discrimination in Hiring

Here’s what you can do to stop age discrimination in the hiring process:

• Develop and enforce anti-age discrimination policies: Create and implement strict anti-age discrimination rules that define how to report discrimination as well as the penalties for breaking these rules. 
• Include age in diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives: Include age as a protected category in DEI initiatives. This can help employees of all generations feel valued and safe.
• Provide training on implicit bias: Educate hiring teams about unconscious bias on ageism. This can help dispel stereotypes about older employees, such as assumptions about their technological skills.

Legal Considerations and Compliance

You must consider age discrimination seriously, as it can pose serious legal complications. Under the ADEA, employees age 40 and above get protection against age discrimination throughout all stages of employment. Refrain from considering age in hiring decisions and making statements regarding age restrictions or your preferred candidate’s age. 

States maintain different standards from the ADEA because their legislation varies substantially. The requirement for minimum employees does not exist in multiple states, including Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Minnesota, Montana, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Vermont and the District of Columbia regarding age discrimination complaints. Age discrimination claims in Illinois, Indiana and Michigan need a single employee to proceed.

Building an Age-Inclusive Hiring Process

An inclusive hiring process that considers all ages is a must for tackling age-based bias and achieving compliance. Here’s a quick summary:

• Age discrimination persists even though the ADEA offers legal protections.
• Many workplaces hold onto negative generalizations about senior employees, claiming they lack technical capability or oppose workplace adjustments. 
• Older employees often bring fresh viewpoints and provide skills-based mentorship to the younger workforce.
• Introducing professional courses can dismantle negative assumptions and help employees learn why different age groups help with diversity.

Commit to fair hiring practices today to build a positive work culture. Get top recruiting advice to hire top talent.